Wolfman: 2010 vs. 1941

2010

The context of the remake remains relatively similar to the original, but the visual and sound effects are very different.  The original film was in black-and-white and was (for better or worse) restricted to the technological capabilities that are available today. The combination of advancements in technology and cosmetology has transformed the Wolfman from a rather hairy, deranged-looking villain (1941) into an extremely masculine, vicious-looking monster (2010).

1941

In addition to the drastic changes in the Wolfman’s appearance, the remake incorporates new levels of gore and violence, and is able to show the entire transformation process between Talbot and the Wolfman.  Many of the scenes in the remake have familiar settings in terms of form and framing, but the remake uses a very modern approach to lens, density, and obviously color values.   For instance, the attack scenes in the woods for both films have “closed” forms since the victims are trapped in an unpatrolled area with the Wolfman in reach, and since the Wolfman is in the same territory they both have “tight” framing.  The lens/filter and density is greatly enhanced in the remake as they use modern technology to filter out props and distort images such as backdrops with special effects like powerful winds and rushing waterfalls.  

I would say that the 1941 version is more appealing to film critics and those appreciative of classic films with soft visuals, while the remake appeals to those who value intense graphics and special effects.   Lastly, it should be mentioned that while the visuals in the two films are very different, both production teams utilized the modern technology of their respected age (so in that sense they are similar).